Smoking Ban in Restaurants has had Little Effect In Galveston

Smoking ban hasn’t led to any citations

The Daily News By Rhiannon Meyers

GALVESTON — After more than two weeks, Galveston’s smoking ban has gotten a little hazy.

While some bars and restaurants are complying with the new law banning smoking indoors, on patios, decks and on sidewalks in front of restaurants and bars, smokers continue to puff away in banned areas across Galveston.

The Galveston Police Department has not issued any citations for smoking.

Most restaurants and bars have banned smoking indoors, but many business owners are turning a blind eye to those who light up on patios and decks, Dennis Byrd, president of the Galveston Restaurant Association and owner of The Spot, said.

Some Galveston establishments continue to allow smoking indoors, and that’s causing some problems for restaurants and bars that are attempting to comply with the indoor smoking ban, Byrd said. The Spot’s waiters, waitresses and bartenders have had trouble explaining to people that smoking is banned citywide, he said.

“We’ve got some customers who come in and say: ‘I don’t understand. I just smoked in a bar downtown,’” he said.

On Wednesday night, smokers lit up unabashedly at the Poop Deck, 2928 Seawall Blvd., and at Melrose Pub, 2002 Postoffice St.

Galveston resident Steve Parag said the smoking ban has influenced his decisions about which places he chooses to patronize. He said he stopped drinking at the bar at Salsa’s Mexican Restaurant, 4604 Seawall Blvd., despite the “fantastic margaritas,” when the restaurant banned smoking. But he said he still spends money at the Poop Deck, where he can enjoy a can of beer and a cigarette without being harassed.

Like many opponents of the smoking ban, Parag said the city council should have left it up to the discretion of business owners to allow smoking or not.

But Rex Bell, who owns Old Quarter Acoustic Cafe, 413 20th St., said he loves the ban. The former smoker said while he’s noticed other Galveston bars continue to allow smoking, he was ready to ban cigarettes at his establishment, which has live bands that often request to play in a smoke-free venue. Patrons haven’t complained much, and he’s had little trouble with the ban, Bell said.

But Byrd said the ban has caused major problems for members of his wait staff who feel uncomfortable telling patrons they can’t smoke on the patio, especially since waiters and waitresses often take hits on their tips when they tell customers to snuff their cigarettes.

“All we get is negative feedback,” he said.

Byrd said while he has no plans to return ashtrays to The Spot’s patio, he is considering letting smokers light up on the patio and instructing his staff to pick up the cigarette butts off the ground.

“I think we’re following suit with everyone else,” he said.

smk Smoking Ban in Restaurants has had Little Effect In GalvestonThe outdoor ban largely has been ignored since the ban went into effect. Although smokers can’t light up within 15 feet of businesses’ front doors or open windows, smokers have been puffing away on the sidewalks along The Strand and Postoffice Street, and on decks and patios throughout Galveston since Jan. 1.

The police have said it is not a priority to enforce the smoking ban. They said they will respond to complaints, but they have to witness a person smoking in an area where smoking is banned to issue a ticket.

The offense is a class C misdemeanor — the equivalent of a traffic ticket — and comes with a $100 fine, unless the violation was done “intentionally, knowingly or recklessly,” which in that case, could come with a fine of up to $2,000.

The ordinance allows the city to ticket a person who owns, operates or controls a public place that fails to comply with the smoking ban. The offense comes with a $200 fine for the first violation, a $400 fine for a second violation and a $500 fine for each additional violation.

However, city spokeswoman Alicia Cahill said police have no plans to ticket the owners of establishments that allow smoking in banned areas.

Bar and restaurant owners have complained about the ordinance, which they said will harm already struggling island businesses.

They repeatedly have asked city council members to amend the ban to allow smoking on decks and patios. Council members on Dec. 10 amended the ordinance to allow smoking in stores specializing in tobacco products. That amendment benefits only Havana Alley Cigar Shop and Lounge, 415 21st St.

However, council members, fearing they were giving the shop an undue advantage, prohibited the shop from allowing its patrons to sip beer, wine and liquor inside the store. The shop also must install a ventilation system and ban anyone younger than 18 years old.

Unlike Galveston, Houston bars and restaurants are overwhelmingly complying with the city’s smoking ban, which went into effect in 2007, Rene Zamore, executive director of the Greater Houston Restaurant Association, said. That’s likely because Houston still allows smokers to light up in outdoor areas, such as decks and patios, she said.

“Restaurants and bars are loving the opportunity that they have an option,” she said. “That really has helped save them from a lot of angst.”

  • email
  • Print
  • StumbleUpon
  • del.icio.us
  • Digg
  • Reddit
  • Mixx
  • Propeller
  • Slashdot
  • Fark
  • Technorati
  • Google Bookmarks
  • NewsVine
  • BlinkList
  • Facebook
  • MySpace
  • blogmarks
  • Add to favorites

Mead Johnson, Maker of Enfamil, Loses Multi-Million Dollar False Advertising Case Against Store-Bran

This is a sponsored guest post written by a Press Release on behalf of PBM Products. Post powered by Sponzai.

GORDONSVILLE, VA., December  2 , 2009PBM Products, LLC, a leading infant formula company that supplies store-brand infant formulas to Walmart, Sam’s Club, Target, Kroger, Walgreens, and other retailers, has received a favorable jury verdict and a $13.5 million damages award in its false advertising lawsuit against Mead Johnson & Co., the operating subsidiary of   Mead Johnson Nutrition Company (NYSE: MJN) (“Mead Johnson”), the makers of the national-brand Enfamil® LIPIL® Infant Formula.  Mead Johnson is 83 percent-owned by Bristol-Myers Squibb.

 

PBM’s lawsuit claimed that Mead Johnson engaged in false and misleading campaigns against PBM’s competing store-brand of infant formulas, suggesting they do not provide the same nutrition as Mead Johnson’s brands.  PBM’s store-brand infant formulas cost up to 50 percent less than Enfamil® LIPIL®.  The $13.5 million in damages awarded by the jury in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia is one of the largest damages awards ever for a false advertising case.

 

“This decision by a jury of the people confirms that Mead Johnson’s ads have been false in suggesting that there is a nutritional difference between our store-brand formula products and their products, when in fact the only major difference is price,” said PBM CEO Paul B. Manning.  “Despite Mead Johnson’s scare tactics, parents are assured that PBM’s formula products are as high quality and nutritious as Mead Johnson’s.”

 

U.S. District Court Judge James R. Spencer issued his written rulings yesterday following the November 10th jury verdict. Judge Spencer’s written rulings permanently enjoined Mead Johnson from making any false statements concerning PBM’s infant formula, including the claims Mead Johnson previously made in Enfamil advertising that "It may be tempting to try a less expensive store brand, but only Enfamil LIPIL is clinically proven to improve brain and eye development," and "there are plenty of other ways to save on baby expenses without cutting back on nutrition."  The Court also ordered Mead Johnson to retrieve from the public domain all advertising or promotional materials containing these or any other false claims about PBM’s store brand infant formula.  

The details of the decision and the complaint are posted online in full at:

 

·      http://www.pbmproducts.com/docs/Order_Laches.pdf

·      http://www.pbmproducts.com/docs/PBM_Complaint_MJ_III_LIPIL.pdf

 

The nutritional supplements under examination in the case are two fats, DHA (docosahexaenoic acid) and ARA (arachidonic acid), which Mead Johnson calls “LIPIL®” solely for marketing purposes and touts as promoting infant brain and eye development. PBM’s claim focused on Mead Johnson’s direct mailing to more than 1.6 million parents of an alarming blurry picture of a child’s cartoon duck next to a clear picture of the same image which suggested that anything other than the Enfamil LIPIL® blend of ingredients is inferior and will result in poor eye and brain development.  Other parts of the false advertising campaign consist of statements that only Enfamil LIPIL has been proven to confer visual and mental benefits on infants, and store-brand formulas are a “cut-back in nutrition” compared to Enfamil. 

 

PBM successfully argued that these advertisements were false and misleading especially since PBM store- brand infant formulas have the same nutrients at the same levels as Enfamil.  PBM infant formulas are formulated to contain DHA and ARA, and are sourced from the same supplier in amounts which equal or exceed the DHA and ARA in Mead Johnson’s Enfamil LIPIL®. 

 

This decision marks the third time PBM Products has sued Mead Johnson for false advertising claims. On the prior occasions Mead Johnson admitted that it made false claims about PBM’s products.  It is also the first false advertising case to focus on the issue of DHA and ARA nutritional ingredients in formula, which were introduced into the market in 2003 and have become a staple in recent years by many brands as key components for infant development.

 

“This jury verdict should send a significant and clear message to Mead Johnson about the way it conducts marketing and advertising for its brands,” said Manning.  “This lawsuit also demonstrates our complete commitment to defending our products and the valuable brands of our retail partners.”

 

“As a parent and supporter of children’s medical research, I take a personal responsibility in assuring our customers that the products we produce are healthy and nutritionally equivalent to brand names like Enfamil® LIPIL®.  It is important, especially now, for parents to know that there are lower priced yet highly nutritious store-brand formulas that will provide the same benefit to their children as any national brand name formula product,” Manning added.   

 

The U.S. infant formula market is estimated at $3.4 billion and the global market is estimated at $7.9 billion.

 

All of PBM’s formulas, and for that matter all of U.S. infant formulas, are subject to the exacting standards of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), pursuant to the Infant Formula Act of 1980.  This legislation vested FDA with the authority to ensure that all infant formula products sold in the United States provide the necessary levels of identified nutrients required for the growth of healthy babies. For more information, visit this FDA link.

 

PBM Products was represented by the law firm Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP.  Partners from the firm’s advertising practice, Harold P. Weinberger and Jonathan M. Wagner in New York, led the team.  

 

About PBM

PBM is privately owned and based in Gordonsville, VA.  PBM companies specialize in manufacturing, distributing, and marketing consumer food, nutritional, and pharmaceutical products. For more information, visit www.pbmproducts.com.

 

Enfamil® LIPIL® are registered trademarks of Mead Johnson & Co.

 

  • email
  • Print
  • StumbleUpon
  • del.icio.us
  • Digg
  • Reddit
  • Mixx
  • Propeller
  • Slashdot
  • Fark
  • Technorati
  • Google Bookmarks
  • NewsVine
  • BlinkList
  • Facebook
  • MySpace
  • blogmarks
  • Add to favorites

Whiskey No Ice is a Shot - Not a Glass Full of Liquor

By Marta Daniels of How To Be A Better Restaurant Customer - Reprinted with permission.

If you order a cocktail with no ice because you don’t want your drink watered down, I get it.  That’s smart.  If you order your drink with no ice because you don’t like drinking cold beverages, I get that too.  But if you order your liquor with no ice (ie. straight up) that’s a shot! You’re not going to receive a glass full of liquor.

whiskey Whiskey No Ice is a Shot   Not a Glass Full of LiquorPeople do the same thing with long island iced teas and margaritas.  “Oh, hold the ice,” they’ll say.  Then when I bring them a cocktail in a smaller glass than the margarita with ice, they say, “Oh no, I want the other one, the big glass!” So we bring them a margarita goblet 2/3 full and they say “Where’s the rest?” To which I reply “The rest would be ice!” You can’t cheat the system and get another half a drink worth of liquor by asking for no ice because, well, we’re not stupid, and my restaurant would actually like to make money.

The same applies if you order a salad with light lettuce and no onions.  That’s perfectly acceptable if you don’t like onions and a whole lot of lettuce.  But don’t expect me to bring you a bowl of cheese, tomatoes and homemade croutons either.  There are specifications for the amount of each item the salad guy puts in our salads.  He may toss in a little extra to compensate for the lack of overall volume in the bowl, especially if you ask for extra cheese and croutons.  But let me reiterate, you’re not going to get a bowl of cheese.  Period.  You really don’t need all that cheese anyways, do you?

People, stop trying to cheat the system with clever little “Hold the this and light that” requests.  Of course you could get a whole fifth of Jack for $15 or $20 and we’re charging you $5.75 a shot.  I also know you could make our house salad at home for about 83 cents and we’re charging $2.75.  But we are neither a liquor store, nor are we a grocery store.  You’re paying for the ambiance, the service, all that jazz.  That’s how restaurants make money!

  • email
  • Print
  • StumbleUpon
  • del.icio.us
  • Digg
  • Reddit
  • Mixx
  • Propeller
  • Slashdot
  • Fark
  • Technorati
  • Google Bookmarks
  • NewsVine
  • BlinkList
  • Facebook
  • MySpace
  • blogmarks
  • Add to favorites

Annual & Holiday Tipping

by Alexis Jeffries
MONEY Magazine – Money Poll
It’s an annual dilemma: What’s an appropriate holiday tip for the people who serve you throughout the year? Etiquette expert Peggy Post recommends a gift of a week’s to a month’s pay for full time help like a nanny; and the cost of at least one visit for people who provide a regular, less frequent service, such as a hairstylist. But you probably also want to keep in line with what your neighbors are giving so you don’t look like a tightwad. In a MONEY poll, readers owned up to the tipping sums below; Post says they are suitably generous.

Average Tip

  • Mail Carrier – $20
  • Hair Dresser – $20
  • Cleaning Person – $75
  • Occasional Babysitter – $25
  • Full-time Nanny – $270
  • Gardener/Yard Worker – $50
  • Newspaper Carrier – $15
  • Garbage Collector – $20
  • email
  • Print
  • StumbleUpon
  • del.icio.us
  • Digg
  • Reddit
  • Mixx
  • Propeller
  • Slashdot
  • Fark
  • Technorati
  • Google Bookmarks
  • NewsVine
  • BlinkList
  • Facebook
  • MySpace
  • blogmarks
  • Add to favorites

December Special Food & Drink Days (American).

National Fruit Cake Month
National Egg Nog Month
Cookie Cutter Week 1st Week
Lager Beer Week 2nd Week
National Egg Nog Week 4th Week
National Pie Day December 1
National Fritters Day December 2
National Apple Pie Day December 3
National Cookie Day December 4
National Sacher Torte Day December 5
National Gazpacho Day December 6
Microwave Oven Day December 6
National Cotton Candy Day December 7
National Chocolate Brownie Day December 8
National Pastry Day December 9
National Lager Day December 10
National Noodle Ring Day December 11
National Cocoa Day December 12
National Bouilabaisse Day December 14
National Cupcake Day December 15
National Chocolate Covered Anything Day December 16
National Maple Syrup Day December 17
National Roast Suckling Pig Day December 18
National Hard Candy Day December 19
National Fried Shrimp Day December 20
National Sangria Day December 20
National Hamburger Day December 21
Kiwi Fruit Day (California) December 21
National Date Nut Bread Day December 22
National Pfeffernuesse Day December 23
National Egg Nog Day December 24
National Pumpkin Pie Day December 25
National Candy Cane Day December 26
National Fruit Cake Day December 27
National Chocolate Candy Day December 28
Pepper Pot Day December 29
National Bicarbonate of Soda Day December 30
National Champagne Day December 31
  • email
  • Print
  • StumbleUpon
  • del.icio.us
  • Digg
  • Reddit
  • Mixx
  • Propeller
  • Slashdot
  • Fark
  • Technorati
  • Google Bookmarks
  • NewsVine
  • BlinkList
  • Facebook
  • MySpace
  • blogmarks
  • Add to favorites

Build a Better Latte with Latte Art!

  • email
  • Print
  • StumbleUpon
  • del.icio.us
  • Digg
  • Reddit
  • Mixx
  • Propeller
  • Slashdot
  • Fark
  • Technorati
  • Google Bookmarks
  • NewsVine
  • BlinkList
  • Facebook
  • MySpace
  • blogmarks
  • Add to favorites